What happened: Supreme Court supervision over illegal constructions and municipal compliance

The Supreme Court criticised civic authorities in state capitals for failing to act against illegal constructions and for allowing unauthorised use of residential premises for non-residential purposes despite earlier directions.

The Supreme Court restrained municipal authorities from issuing orders that contradict Supreme Court instructions. The Court warned that interference with Supreme Court directions could lead to contempt proceedings.

The Supreme Court directed civic bodies across India to take action against illegal constructions within their jurisdictions, clear public spaces and roads of stray cattle, and file compliance affidavits within three weeks.

In court, the Additional Solicitor-General reported enforcement steps taken by the Bhopal Municipal Corporation. The Additional Solicitor-General said that Bhopal Municipal Corporation sealed around 100 premises and later unsealed them after the State paused action and formed a panel to frame a policy for commercial establishments in residential areas. The Additional Solicitor-General urged the Supreme Court to restrain the State from interfering with civic bodies’ statutory functions.

Background and earlier position: Tamil Nadu land-use and building bye-laws case; expansion to multiple state capitals

Related current affairs