What happened
The Karnataka High Court adjourned further proceedings on a petition filed by Shivashankarappa S. Sahukar challenging the Governor’s order suspending him as chairperson of the Karnataka Public Service Commission (KPSC). The court will examine the legal interpretation of Article 317(2) of the Constitution and the scope of the Governor’s power to suspend a State Public Service Commission chairperson pending inquiry.
The suspension followed allegations that Sahukar’s daughter obtained a reserved government job using a fake income certificate.
Background and earlier position
Article 317 is the constitutional safeguard for the independence of Public Service Commissions. It deals with the removal of a member of a State Public Service Commission by the President after inquiry, and it also contains a limited power under Article 317(2) relating to suspension pending inquiry.
State Public Service Commissions, including the KPSC, are constitutional bodies that conduct recruitment and advise state governments on personnel matters. Their independence is important because recruitment fairness affects public employment, reservations, and administrative integrity.
Related current affairs
- Karnataka HC slams civil judge involved in road rage incident, halts probe against wife; overturns indictment process
- Kodagu homemstay ‘rape’: After HC fines state, owner seeks quashing of chargesheet
- SC seeks Revanna’s response on petition by Karnataka govt.
- HC quashes charges against homestay owner in rape case
- U.S. government pauses immigrant visa appointments for applicants worldwide
- SC notice to Jharkhand on plea on exam irregularities