What happened: court refused to prohibit a Lord Jagannath film
A court declined to order a prohibition on a film related to Lord Jagannath. The court’s reasoning, as reported, emphasized freedom of expression arguments and the constitutional threshold for when a ban is justified for immediate restriction.
Background and earlier position: censorship versus freedom of expression
Constitutional disputes about films and creative works involving religious subject matter typically require balancing two ideas: Freedom of speech and expression protects artistic expression and public debate, including expression that relates to religion.Reasonable restrictions allow limits only when restrictions are justified under the Constitution’s permitted grounds.
What changed now: refusal of a blanket restriction at the current stage
The court refused to impose a blanket restriction by banning the Lord Jagannath film at that stage. The court indicated that the film’s content did not warrant an immediate, all-encompassing prohibition at the current point in the legal process.
Related current affairs
- Voter ID, Aadhaar, PAN not conclusive proof of Indian citizenship: Calcutta HC
- Karnataka HC slams civil judge involved in road rage incident, halts probe against wife; overturns indictment process
- Express Special: ‘Treated like criminals’: Externed from Mumbai, meet the 3 who got HC relief
- Retrospective green bond: SC strikes down Centre’s order, opens window for exception
- Court’s jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution
- Hiding the scissors: The censor board has strayed from the law that underpins its existence