What happened
A context box in parliamentary discussion, as described in a news report, claims that experts assessed a bill currently being discussed in Parliament and found it essentially the same as a bill rejected in 2022 and another bill rejected in 2023, with only cosmetic changes.
Background and earlier position
The similarity claim is anchored to earlier parliamentary outcomes in 2022 and 2023. The context box uses those rejections to suggest that the current bill continues the same underlying controversy and does not materially change the underlying legislative substance.
What changed now
The current claim restricts differences to cosmetic changes, implying that drafting and presentation may have changed while legal effect is said to remain substantially similar to earlier rejected versions. The excerpt available for this study note does not provide clause-level comparisons.