GS2The Hindu · Editorial
A personal sacrifice must inspire India’s education renaissance movement
Education reform, teacher quality, assessment change, and welfare-scheme accountability are the two main governance themes in the supplied op-ed and policy note
SP
Samachar Pathshala Desk
Published 17 Jul 2026 · 1 min
Key takeaways
- The scheme provides ₹1,500 a month through Direct Benefit Transfer to eligible women aged 21 to 65 years with an Aadhaar-linked bank account and family income below ₹2.5 lakh.
- Verification drives and mandatory e-KYC reduced the number of beneficiaries from 2.43 crore to about 1.66 crore.
- The Comptroller and Auditor General of India said Maharashtra spent ₹33,237.24 crore against an allocation of ₹29,693.09 crore under the scheme and called the excess expenditure unjustified.
What happened
The reform agenda argued in the op-ed
The author lists ten urgent reforms:
The UPSC angle
GS2GS3Essay
Education reform as a governance and social-justice issue
UPSC may frame the education part around structural reform rather than a personality-driven protest: examination reform, teacher quality, school standards, research funding, and the link between education and demographic dividend. UPSC may also test the Maharashtra scheme controversy as a question on targeting, fiscal discipline, and audit accountability in welfare schemes.
Related dispatches
The Hindu
Pre-poll promises, post-poll precarity
The Hindu
Maharashtra govt. duped women under Ladki Bahin scheme, alleges State Cong.
PIB
RUSA phase-3/PM-USHA projects approved under Rashtriya Uchchatar Shiksha Abhiyan and PM-USHA
The Indian Express
After Assam and Bihar, Bengal and Maharashtra say ‘no’ to coercive action