What happened: reporting permitted, hearing clip reuse restricted
The Supreme Court clarified media rules for court coverage. Recognised news outlets may continue reporting on court proceedings. The Supreme Court also restricted recognised news outlets from “utilising” audio and video clippings of judicial hearings on digital platforms without prior approval.
Background and earlier position: Supreme Court interim order of July 24
The Supreme Court’s July 31 clarification was linked to an earlier Supreme Court July 24 interim order. The July 24 interim order barred unauthorised actions related to recordings of judicial proceedings on digital platforms without prior approval, including unauthorised sharing, unauthorised posting, unauthorised monetisation, and unauthorised storage of such recordings.
What changed now: reportage allowed, but audio-video clip utilisation is conditioned
The July 31 clarification strengthens a separation for recognised news outlets: reporting on what happens in court remains permissible, while reuse and dissemination of hearing audio-video recordings/clippings on digital platforms is restricted unless the recognised news outlet obtains prior approval.
Related current affairs
- SC acquits murder convict who served 22 years in prison
- Money Bill route pending before SC, Govt chooses its next steps
- Petition seeks disclosure of identity of shop owners
- SC seeks action on illegal constructions, warns civic authorities of contempt
- Listen to Gen Z, don’t repress them, says SC on NEET-UG protests
- 10-km mining buffer applies to all wetland reserves: SC