The Supreme Court did not take action against a petitioner who disrupted proceedings by giving an incoherent address and throwing a bundle of papers toward the bench. The order later indicated that the court considered the petitioner’s condition and also found no reason to interfere with the judgment on merits.
The incident involved two judges hearing the case. Security personnel intervened immediately after the disruption. The petitioner was identified as Prabal Pratap.
Related current affairs
- ‘Don’t play politics’: SC on Ram Temple controversy
- SC fines comedian Samay Raina Rs 3L for defying court
- Acid ingestion included in amended Act: Centre to SC on redefining “acid attack victim”
- Why was Acting CJ of Rajasthan HC not shifted, judge asks CJI
- SC asks Centre to consider plea for reduction in NEET-SS cut-off
- Imran Khan’s sister files contempt plea over violation of SC hospitalisation order
