What happened
Congress leader(s) criticised the timing of a delayed prorogation of Parliament and called the delay “abnormal.” The criticism links prorogation timing to constitutional procedure and to Parliament practice about when prorogation can happen in relation to House proceedings.
Background and earlier position
Under Article 85(2), the President terminates a session of Parliament by order. The constitutional rule of action is that the President acts on the Prime Minister’s advice. The Congress-linked discussion also raised a practice point that the Prime Minister may consult the Cabinet before submitting advice to the President (consultation before advice is a practice-based claim, not a standalone constitutional text quoted here).
Parliament practice on timing is described in two ways in the reported discussion: Prorogation may be done at any time, including while the House is sitting, even though the usual practice is to prorogue after adjournment sine die (adjournment sine die means the House is adjourned without fixing a future sitting date).Adjournment and prorogation can occur on the same day in some instances.
What changed now
Related current affairs
- From Page One: Cong. flags ‘abnormal’ LS prorogation delay (Practice and Procedure of Parliament references)
- Congress highlights ‘abnormal’ delay in Lok Sabha prorogation
- Monsoon Session sees multiple lows in Parliament productivity
- The cliche of the Monsoon Session comes to an end
- Opposition ‘fled’ from meaningful debate in Parliament: Nitin Nabin
- Shah says ready to answer questions in House; don’t want lecture, counters Oppn