Withdraw FIRs against protesters, stop legal proceedings, demands CJP (caption/strap for lead)
CJP demanded withdrawal of FIRs against protesters and an end to court proceedings linked to those FIRs, with the demand tied to allegations of non-action involving Assam and Bihar.

- An FIR is the written information given to police for a cognisable offence; it usually starts the police investigation.
- FIRs can lead to charge sheets and criminal trials; stopping legal proceedings would affect the court process for those protest-related cases.
- Protester-linked FIRs can raise due process questions, because courts decide criminal responsibility using legal standards and fair procedure.
- The news discussion includes allegations of non-action against protest-linked criminal cases in Assam and Bihar.
What happened: CJP demand on FIR withdrawals and linked court proceedings
CJP demanded the withdrawal of FIRs against protesters and sought an end to court proceedings connected to those FIRs.
Background: how protest-related criminal cases move through the system
UPSC can examine how state police and prosecutorial choices in protest-related criminal cases should align with legal procedure, due process (fair procedure), and accountability, especially when selective enforcement is alleged across states.
Related dispatches



