The right to protest and the limits of police power
Police power, unlawful assembly, and constitutional protest rights in India
- The police said the organisers did not seek permission for a procession to Parliament and relied on prohibitory orders under Section 163 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023.
- The National Human Rights Commission manual on democratic policing presents police as protectors of citizens' rights and the rule of law.
- The principles require any use of force to be lawful, necessary, and proportionate.
- The Supreme Court has held that excessive force violates fundamental rights, that demonstrations can be regulated for public order, and that the right to protest cannot be extinguished.
What happened
Police action against a 'Chalo Sansad' protest march at Jantar Mantar in central Delhi has revived a core constitutional question: how should a democracy police dissent? The incident matters for UPSC because it sits at the intersection of Article 19, public order, police accountability, and proportional use of force.
The protest reportedly led to tear gas use and lathi charges. The same event also triggered reported temporary Metro closures and disruption of mobile connectivity, showing how quickly a public-order issue can widen into a broader civil-liberties concern.
UPSC may ask how Article 19(1)(b) and Article 19(3) balance peaceful protest with public order, how unlawful assembly is defined under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and what ethical and legal standards should govern police use of force during crowd dispersal.
Related dispatches
